UPDATED: 09-08-25 10:43 PDT

women Pace 2
  
Pace                  
W-L: (16- 4) PR = 95.3768

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 221 H Roberts Wesleyan East Coast ( 7- 8, 89.9) 20- 8 226 H Molloy East Coast (10- 8, 90.3) 17- 5 301 H Seton Hill PSAC (13- 6, 94.1) 17-14 302 H Regis (CO) Rocky Mountai (13- 4, 93.3) 11-10 305 A Franklin Pierce Northeast 10 ( 3-11, 85.3) 18- 4 316 A Florida Southern Sunshine (17- 2, 99.3) 11-20 319 A Tampa Sunshine (17- 1, 99.9) 8-17 326 H Adelphi Northeast 10 (16- 3, 94.8) 16-12 329 A American International Northeast 10 ( 2-14, 78.2) 22- 4 402 A Assumption Northeast 10 ( 6-10, 90.9) 20- 6 405 A Southern New Hampshire Northeast 10 ( 8- 9, 90.9) 18- 6 408 A Southern Connecticut Northeast 10 ( 9- 8, 90.4) 13- 8 410 H New Haven Northeast 10 (12- 5, 94.8) 9-12 412 H St Michaels Northeast 10 ( 6-10, 87.0) 17- 4 416 H Mercy East Coast (10- 7, 92.6) 16-12 419 H Bentley Northeast 10 (10- 6, 92.6) 20- 9 423 H St Anselm Northeast 10 (12- 6, 92.7) 17-11 426 H Southern New Hampshire Northeast 10 ( 8- 9, 90.9) 19- 4 430 H St Anselm Northeast 10 (12- 6, 92.7) 14-13 503 H Adelphi Northeast 10 (16- 3, 94.8) 13-14

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   221 H Roberts Wesleyan       20- 8      12     6           0.00
   226 H Molloy                 17- 5      12     6           0.00
   301 H Seton Hill             17-14       3     2           1.14
   302 H Regis (CO)             11-10       1     3          -1.62
   305 A Franklin Pierce        18- 4      14    10           0.00
   316 A Florida Southern       11-20      -9    -4          -0.54
   319 A Tampa                   8-17      -9    -5           0.00
   326 H Adelphi                16-12       4     1    +      2.86
   329 A American International 22- 4      18    17           0.00
   402 A Assumption             20- 6      14     4           1.03
   405 A Southern New Hampshire 18- 6      12     4           1.09
   408 A Southern Connecticut   13- 8       5     4           0.54
   410 H New Haven               9-12      -3     1    --    -4.09
   412 H St Michaels            17- 4      13     9           0.00
   416 H Mercy                  16-12       4     3           0.70
   419 H Bentley                20- 9      11     3           1.62
   423 H St Anselm              17-11       6     3           1.74
   426 H Southern New Hampshire 19- 4      15     5           0.00
   430 H St Anselm              14-13       1     3    -     -2.26
   503 H Adelphi                13-14      -1     1    -     -2.14

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   410 H New Haven               9-12      -3     1    --    -4.09
   430 H St Anselm              14-13       1     3    -     -2.26
   503 H Adelphi                13-14      -1     1    -     -2.14

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   326 H Adelphi                16-12       4     1    +      2.86

Pace Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Adelphi Pace insuffient: (11- 2)(12- 1) Pace
Alabama-Huntsville Pace tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Pace
American International Pace Pace  
Anderson (SC) Pace tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Pace
Ashland Pace   Pace
Assumption Pace Pace  
Barton Pace   Pace
Belmont Abbey Pace   Pace
Bentley Pace Pace  
Bloomsburg Pace   Pace
Bridgeport Pace Pace   4- 0 vs 1- 3
Caldwell Pace Pace   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Catawba Pace   Pace
Charleston Pace   Pace
Chestnut Hill Pace   Pace
Chowan Pace   Pace
Coker Pace   Pace
Colorado Mesa Pace tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Pace
Colorado-Colorado Spring Pace insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Pace
Concordia-St Paul Pace   Pace
Converse Pace   Pace
CSU-Pueblo Pace insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Pace
D'Youville Pace Pace   8- 0 vs 2- 6
Daemen Pace Pace   5- 0 vs 0- 5
Davenport Pace   Pace
Davis & Elkins Pace   Pace
District of Columbia Pace Pace   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Dominican (CA) Pace tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Pace
Dominican (NY) Dominican (NY) insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) Dominican (NY)
East Stroudsburg East Stroudsburg insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 1) East Stroudsburg
Edinboro Pace insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Pace
Embry-Riddle Embry-Riddle insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) Embry-Riddle
Emmanuel (GA) Pace   Pace
Emory & Henry Pace   Pace
Felician Pace Pace   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Findlay Pace   Pace
Flagler Flagler tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Flagler
Florida Southern Florida Southern Florida Southern  
Florida Tech Pace insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) Pace
Fort Lewis Pace Pace   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Franklin Pierce Pace Pace  
Frostburg State Pace insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Pace
Gannon Pace insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Pace
Georgian Court Pace Pace   4- 0 vs 1- 3
Grand Valley State Pace insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Pace
Holy Family Pace Pace   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Indiana (PA) Pace insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Pace
Indianapolis Pace tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) Pace
Kutztown Pace insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) Pace
Lake Erie Pace   Pace
Lander Pace tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Pace
Lee Pace tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Pace
Lees-McRae Pace   Pace
Lenoir-Rhyne Pace   Pace
Lewis Pace   Pace
Limestone Pace   Pace
Lincoln Memorial Pace tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Pace
Lock Haven Pace Pace   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Lynn Lynn tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) Lynn
Malone Pace   Pace
Mars Hill Pace   Pace
Maryville Maryville tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Maryville
McKendree Pace   Pace
Mercy Pace Pace  
Millersville Pace tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Pace
Missouri Western Pace   Pace
Molloy Pace Pace  
Montevallo Pace   Pace
Mount Olive Pace tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Pace
New Haven New Haven New Haven  
Newberry Pace   Pace
North Greenville Pace   Pace
Northern Michigan Pace   Pace
Northwood Pace   Pace
Palm Beach Atlantic Pace tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Pace
Post Pace   Pace
Quincy Pace   Pace
Regis (CO) Pace Pace  
Roberts Wesleyan Pace Pace  
Rockhurst Pace   Pace
Rollins Pace tied - ( 1- 3) ( 1- 2) Pace
Saginaw Valley State Pace   Pace
Seton Hill Pace Pace  
Shepherd Pace   Pace
Shippensburg Pace   Pace
Shorter Pace   Pace
Slippery Rock Slippery Rock tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Slippery Rock
Southern Connecticut Pace Pace  
Southern New Hampshire Pace Pace  
Southern Wesleyan Pace   Pace
St Anselm Pace Pace  
St Leo St Leo tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 2) St Leo
St Michaels Pace Pace  
St Thomas Aquinas Pace Pace   5- 0 vs 0- 5
Tampa Tampa Tampa  
Thomas Jefferson Pace Pace   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Thomas More Pace   Pace
Tiffin Pace   Pace
Tusculum Pace   Pace
Ursuline Pace   Pace
UVA Wise Pace   Pace
Virginia State Pace   Pace
Walsh Pace   Pace
West Chester West Chester tied - ( 5- 0) ( 5- 0) West Chester
West Virginia Wesleyan Pace   Pace
Westminster (UT) Pace Pace   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Wheeling Pace   Pace
William Jewell Pace   Pace
Wilmington (DE) Pace insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Pace
Wingate Pace insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Pace
Young Harris Pace   Pace

PowerWise = 99


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 16.16

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Roberts Wesley  ( 7- 8, 89.9)    20- 8      -10.02      21.16      -0.55         0.81            16.65
   0 H Molloy          (10- 8, 90.3)    17- 5       -9.61      21.57      -0.55         0.81            16.99
   0 H Seton Hill      (13- 6, 94.1)    17-14       -5.83      25.35      -0.55         0.81            20.04
   0 H Regis (CO)      (13- 4, 93.3)    11-10       -6.59      24.59      -0.55         0.81            19.42
   0 A Franklin Pierc  ( 3-11, 85.3)    18- 4      -14.60      16.58       0.55         0.81            13.84
   0 A Florida Southe  (17- 2, 99.3)    11-20       -0.62      30.56       0.55         0.81            -0.05
   0 A Tampa           (17- 1, 99.9)     8-17       -0.00      31.18       0.55         0.81            -0.45
   0 H Adelphi         (16- 3, 94.8)    16-12       -5.11      26.07      -0.55         0.81            20.62
   0 A American Inter  ( 2-14, 78.2)    22- 4      -21.67       9.52       0.55         0.81             8.14
   0 A Assumption      ( 6-10, 90.9)    20- 6       -9.05      22.13       0.55         0.81            18.33
   0 A Southern New H  ( 8- 9, 90.9)    18- 6       -8.99      22.19       0.55         0.81            18.38
   0 A Southern Conne  ( 9- 8, 90.4)    13- 8       -9.54      21.64       0.55         0.81            17.93
   0 H New Haven       (12- 5, 94.8)     9-12       -5.06      26.12      -0.55         0.81            -4.54
   0 H St Michaels     ( 6-10, 87.0)    17- 4      -12.94      18.24      -0.55         0.81            14.29
   0 H Mercy           (10- 7, 92.6)    16-12       -7.27      23.91      -0.55         0.81            18.87
   0 H Bentley         (10- 6, 92.6)    20- 9       -7.35      23.83      -0.55         0.81            18.81
   0 H St Anselm       (12- 6, 92.7)    17-11       -7.23      23.95      -0.55         0.81            18.90
   0 H Southern New H  ( 8- 9, 90.9)    19- 4       -8.99      22.19      -0.55         0.81            17.48
   0 H St Anselm       (12- 6, 92.7)    14-13       -7.23      23.95      -0.55         0.81            18.90
   0 H Adelphi         (16- 3, 94.8)    13-14       -5.11      26.07      -0.55         0.81            -4.57
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       267.99

winning pts = 277.6002 losing points = -9.6087

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------